High performance MEMS scanner

ABSTRACT

A high performance MEMS scanner is disclosed. In some embodiments, scanner mirror has a wide and short aspect ratio that is similar to rotating polygon facets. Long torsion arms allow large rotation angles including 20° zero-to-peak mechanical and greater. Suspensions couple the scan mirror to torsion arms, reducing dynamic mirror deformation by spreading the torque load. “leverage members” at the distal ends of the torsion arms help reduce stress concentrations. Elimination of a mounting frame increases device yield. Heater leads allow for precise trimming of the scanner resonant frequency. A compressive mount holds mounting pads against mounting structures.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit from and incorporates by reference theco-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/571,133,entitled MEMS DEVICE HAVING SIMPLIFIED DRIVE, invented by Randall B.Sprague et al., applied for on May 14, 2004, and claims benefit from andincorporates by reference co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationSer. No. 60/542,896, entitled MEMS SYSTEM ADAPTED TO A LASER PRINTER,invented by Wyatt O. Davis et al., applied for on Feb. 9, 2004.

This application also relates to material in and incorporates byreference the co-pending U.S. Patent Application entitled METHOD ANDAPPARATUS FOR MAKING A MEMS SCANNER, invented by Kelly Linden et al.,Ser. No. 10/986,635, applied for on the same date as this application.

This application also relates to material in and incorporates byreference the co-pending U.S. Patent Application entitled METHOD ANDAPPARATUS FOR SCANNING A BEAM OF LIGHT, invented by Greg Gibson et al.,Ser. No. 10/988,155, applied for on the same date as this application.

This application also relates to material in and incorporates byreference the co-pending U.S. Patent Application entitled MEMS DEVICEHAVING SIMPLIFIED DRIVE, invented by Randall B. Sprague et al., Ser. No.10/984,327, applied for on Nov. 9, 2004.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to microelectromechanical system (MEMS)beam scanners and particularly to their application to high resolution,high pixel rate applications.

BACKGROUND

Beam scanning has become important for a variety of applicationsincluding scanned beam displays, bar code scanners, andelectrophotographic printers. In prior art beam scanning applications,and especially in high performance applications, rotating polygonscanners have been in common use.

By way of example, the operation of a rotating polygon scanner in a beamscanning system will be described. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating theprincipal features of a typical rotating polygon-based beam scanningsystem 101. A laser diode 102 having a wavelength matched to therequirements of the application may optionally be modulated with animage data signal if required. Beam-forming optics 104 produce a laserbeam having a desired shape and trajectory. The laser beam is reflectedoff a rotating polygon mirror 106, and particularly off the facets 108a, 108 b thereof, individual facets 108 a and 108 b being indexed forclarity. It may be noted that the design of the beam scanning system 101is such that the reflective surfaces 108 a, 108 b, etc. of the rotatingpolygon 106 are placed forward of the center of rotation such that thearriving beam sweeps over each mirror surface as the mirror surface isrotated. The beam is deflected across a deflection angle to form ascanned (and optionally, modulated) beam 110.

One difficulty encountered with rotating polygon-based beam scanningsystems relates to the rotating polygon itself. Rotating polygon mirrorsmay suffer from relatively large mass, slow ramp-up to speed, largesize, noise, bearing reliability issues, relatively high powerconsumption, and other shortcomings.

As mentioned above, high speed bar code scanners have typically usedrotating polygon mirrors to produce scan rates and resolutionssufficient for throughput-sensitive applications such as in-counterscanning at retail check-out and high-speed package sorting. One exampleof such a scanner is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,045,046 of Paul O.Detwiler, entitled FULL COVERAGE BARCODE SCANNER, hereby incorporated byreference. It may be noted that other such examples do not vary theangle of the polygon facets to create parallel scan paths, insteadincluding in the scan path a vertical scan mirror that oscillates aboutthe second axis.

As mentioned above, scanned beam displays also use beam scanners.Various scanned beam display embodiments have been disclosed in the art.One such example includes scanned beam displays such as that describedin U.S. Pat. No. 5,467,104 of Furness et al., entitled VIRTUAL RETINALDISPLAY, which is incorporated herein by reference. Similarly,electrophotographic printers (commonly referred to as “laser printers”),LIDAR systems, rotating laser levels, document scanners, and other beamscanning systems have heretofore made use of rotating polygon beamscanners. To a greater or lesser degree, these and other applications,when embodied using rotating polygon scanners, have suffered from thedrawbacks inherent thereto.

In other applications, beam scanner performance may be convenientlycharacterized as the product of scan angle times mirror size, as afunction of scan frequency. According to common usage, the product maybe referred to as “theta-D” (ΘD) where theta refers to half themechanical scan angle and “D” refers to mirror size. Implicit in thisterminology is the assumption that static and dynamic deformation of thescan mirror surface remains within acceptable limits, frequently no morethan ⅕ of the shortest wavelength of light being deflected (λ/5). Sincea larger mirror size enables a smaller diffraction limited beam spot anda larger deflection angle allows a greater field width at a givendistance over which to line up a row of spots, ΘD is proportional to thenumber of spots that may be resolved (e.g. displayed or detected) in ascan line. Frequency, of course, relates to the number of scan linesthat may be produced per unit time. Hence, a larger ΘD scanner generallycorresponds to higher performance.

According to the prior art, it has proven relatively difficult toachieve high ΘD at high scan frequencies while maintaining sufficientmirror flatness. Dynamic stresses on scan mirrors work against keepingmirrors flat when they are operated at combinations of relatively largescan angle, high frequency, and with a large mirror size.

Overview

According to one aspect, a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) beamscanner is disclosed that attains high performance. In particular,various embodiments are operable with a relatively large ΘD product atrelatively high scan frequency, all while maintaining sufficient mirrorflatness to meet system requirements.

Another aspect relates a MEMS beam scanner having performance andproperties that make it amenable for use in applications that haveheretofore been the domain of rotating polygon scanners. The use of suchan approach can result in reduced mass and size, faster start-up,reduced noise, higher reliability, and other advantages compared torotating polygon mirrors.

According to an aspect of the invention, a MEMS beam scanner may beformed with physical and operational attributes; including mirror size,scan angle, scan frequency, and mirror flatness; to be especiallywell-adapted to replace a rotating polygon mirror in a range ofapplications. For some applications, a MEMS mirror with extended lengthtransverse the scanning axis can be substituted for a rotating polygonwithout substantial modifications to existing optical designs.

According to another aspect, a MEMS scanner is formed having torsion armgeometry adaptable to a large scan angle. The torsion arms may beseveral times longer than the longitudinal dimension of the mirrorsurface.

According to another aspect, leverage members are formed on the distalend of the torsion arms (away from the scan mirror). The leveragemembers serve to reduce stress concentrations, enlarge the scan angle,provide connection to laterally-displaced mounting pads, and create amoment arm for driving the scanner from an off-chip actuator.

According to another aspect of the invention, a MEMS scanner is mountedto an actuator assembly using a clamping pressure that holds mountingpads in substantially continuous contact with a linear actuator. Whenthe linear actuator is a piezo-electric actuator stack, for example,this positive pressure maintains compressive force or minimizes tensionforces in the piezo-electric actuator stack, thereby improvingreliability, robustness, and/or life.

According to another aspect, a heater varies the spring constant of aMEMS torsion arm, thus modifying the resonant frequency of a scanningmirror supported therefrom. The fineness of resonance frequency controlthus achieved allows operation of the MEMS scanner close to its resonantfrequency. Heating may be accomplished by joule heating of the bulksemiconductive material, such as silicon, within at least portions ofthe MEMS scanner itself. A doping process optionally creates a chargecarrier channel having a graded resistivity vs. depth. Metal layers maybe applied to regions of the MEMS scanner to reduce subjacent jouleheating within such regions.

According to another aspect, a MEMS scanner may be formed having noouter frame, such as a photolithographically-formed frame. Instead, aplurality of mounting pads may be formed.

According to another aspect, a number of MEMS scanners are formed on asilicon wafer having a plurality of mounting pads. The irregularlyshaped devices are formed on a silicon wafer in an interlaced mannerwith mounting pads overlapping, e.g. intruding into the area ofneighboring dies that would heretofore have been occupied by a frame.Devices are almost released from the silicon wafer using a deep etchingprocess such as deep reactive ion etch (DRIE). One or more “lands” or“bridges” maintain connection between the part and the wafer or betweenadjacent parts to mechanically stabilize the wafer. The bridges aresubsequently broken to remove the parts.

According to another aspect, a scanner controller includes provision formaintaining a scanner resonant frequency that matches a systemoperational frequency. In an exemplary embodiment, this is implementedas a phase difference driven servo control loop.

According to another aspect, a scanner controller includes a heateramplifier for applying a current to a scanner heater.

According to another aspect, a MEMS scanner controller includes a phaseservo control loop to lock a scanner phase to a system phase.

According to another aspect, a scanner controller includes one or moreservo loops that operate in a pseudo-locked state during a system idleprocess, thus allowing faster start-up.

According to another aspect, a MEMS scanner controller applies a drivevoltage during start-up that is significantly higher than the drivevoltage used during operation. The high drive voltage is useful forachieving faster start-up.

Other aspects will become apparent to the reader through reference tothe appended brief description of the drawings, detailed description,claims, and figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a beam scanning system with a rotatingpolygon scanner.

FIG. 2A is a top view of a MEMS scanner made according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 2B is a top view of a MEMS scanner made according to anotherembodiment.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a MEMS scanner made according to anotherembodiment.

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the dynamic response of the MEMS scannerof FIG. 3.

FIG. 5A is a view of a number of MEMS devices showing how they arearrayed on a silicon wafer during manufacture.

FIG. 5B illustrates an alternative layout of MEMS devices on a wafer.

FIG. 6 is a view of a MEMS mounting clamp.

FIG. 7 is a detailed view of a piezo-electric stack used to form theactuator of FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 is a front perspective view of a MEMS scanner package for use ina beam scanning subsystem.

FIG. 9 includes two additional perspective views of the MEMS scannerpackage of FIG. 8.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a control system for driving a MEMSscanner.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a start-up method for driving a MEMSscanner.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 2A illustrates one embodiment of a high performance MEMS scanner202. MEMS scanner 202 may be used in a variety of applications,including for instance, a high speed, high resolution LBP, a high-speedbar code scanner, a scanned beam display, a LIDAR system, a scannedlaser level, and other applications. MEMS scanner 202 isphotolithographically formed from single-crystal silicon using bulkmicromachining as is known to the art. A scan plate 204 having a mirrorsurface is coupled to a pair of torsion arms 206 a, 206 b throughrespective suspensions; the suspensions consisting of suspension beams208 a, 208 b, suspension center connectors 218 a, 218 b, and suspensionouter connectors 216 a, 216 b, 216 c, 216 d as indicated. Torsion arms206 a, 206 b define a rotational axis 210 about which scan plate 204 andsuspension beams 208 a, 208 b rotate. As may be appreciated from theteaching of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/571,133, entitledMEMS DEVICE HAVING SIMPLIFIED DRIVE, invented by Randall B. Sprague etal., applied for on May 14, 2004, commonly assigned herewith and hereinincorporated by reference, the suspensions help to keep the mirrorsurface relatively flat, typically within ¼ wavelength, by spreading thetorque loads induced by the torsion arms 206 a, 206 b across the surfaceof the scan plate 204.

Suspension beams 208 are each coupled to scan plate 204 by respectiveouter (lateral) connectors 216 a, 216 b, 216 c, 216 d and respectiveaxial connectors 218 a, 218 b. Taken together, suspension elements 208a, 216 a, 216 b, and 218 a form a first suspension coupling betweenfirst torsion arm 206 a and scan plate 204. Similarly suspensionelements 208 b, 216 c, 216 d, and 218 b form a second suspensioncoupling between second torsion arm 206 b and scan plate 204.

Torsion arms 206 a, 206 b terminate at respective “leverage members” 212a and 212 b. Leverage members 212 a and 212 b, in turn connect torespective mounting pads 214 a, 214 b and 214 c, 214 d at respectivelateral points as illustrated. Taken together, leverage member 212 a andmounting pads 214 a, 214 b constitute a first mounting structure forcoupling torsion arm 206 a to a support structure (not shown).Similarly, leverage member 212 b and mounting pads 214 c, 214 d form asecond mounting structure for coupling torsion arm 206 b to a supportstructure (not shown). In alternative embodiments, mounting structurescan take other forms, including for example a pair of rectangularmounting pads, each joined directly to a respective torsion arm, asingle frame formed peripheral to the scan plate 204 and torsion arms206 a, 206 b, or other forms. The exemplary embodiment of FIG. 2A mayhave certain advantages such as, for example, packing more devices perwafer, having reduced dynamic stress, allowing individual mounting padsto be coupled to actuators, and allowing the mounting pads 214 to“float” relative to one another, thereby reducing residual stresses inthe MEMS scanner.

In an alternative embodiment, the leverage members 212 a and 212 b jointo a peripheral mounting frame at lateral points, the peripheral framesurrounding the scan plate, torsion arms, and leverage members accordingto a conventional MEMS arrangement.

Scan plate 204 and the mirror thereon may be formed, for example, tohave a lateral extent (in the direction perpendicular to the axis ofrotation 210) that is substantially greater than its longitudinal extent(in the direction parallel to the axis of rotation 210). Among otherconsiderations, this may be used advantageously to mimic the facet of arotating polygon mirror, thus aiding in the use of scanner 202 as areplacement for a rotating polygon scanner in a variety of applications.Alternatively, scan plate 204 may be formed as a lower aspect ratiorectangle, square, circle, ellipse, or other shape as may be appropriatefor a given application.

As illustrated in FIG. 2A, MEMS scanner 202 includes two torsion arms206 a, 206 b, each 18.76 millimeters long (including fillets),terminated on their proximal ends by a 400 micron by 200 micronelliptical fillet at respective suspensions (in particular at suspensionbeams 208 a, 208 b), and terminated on their distal ends at respectiveleverage members 212 a, 212 b, again with a 400 micron by 200 micronelliptical fillet. The torsion arms 206 a, 206 b are 384 microns wide.As with the rest of MEMS scanner 202, the torsion arms are etched to afull wafer thickness of 700 microns using DRIE processing. For a givenmirror mass, the width, depth, and length of the torsion arms andleverage members may be adjusted to produce alternative resonant scanfrequencies and angles.

The suspension beams 208 a, 208 b are 396 microns wide and are slightlybent to make a slightly obtuse angle with respective torsion arms 206 a,206 b of 91.6 degrees, and extend laterally to an extent equal to thelateral extent of the scan plate 204. Respective suspension centerconnectors 218 a, 218 b extend from the centerlines of suspension beams208 a, 208 b to the centerline of the scan plate 204, a distance of 500microns (including fillets). The center connectors 218 a, 218 b are each164 microns wide and include 100 micron radius fillets at both ends.Four suspension outer connectors 216 a, 216 b, 216 c, and 216 d extendfrom the ends of suspension beams 208 a, 208 b to the scan plate 204,one on each end of each suspension beam as indicated. The outerconnectors 216 a, 216 b, 216 c, 216 d are each 250 microns wide(laterally) by 400 microns long (longitudinally) and do not havefillets. The respective suspensions thus each include a suspension beam208, a center suspension connector 218, and two outer suspensionconnectors 216; and connect the torsion arms 206 a, 206 b to the scanplate 204 in a manner that reduces stress concentrations, spreads thetorque load, and reduces dynamic deformation of the scan plate duringoperation. Alternative suspension configurations are possible and couldbe implemented by one skilled in the art.

The scan plate of the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 2A is 6 millimetersby 6 millimeters square.

The leverage members 212 a, 212 b are each 1.8 millimeters long (totallateral dimension inclusive of fillets) by 400 microns wide(longitudinal dimension) and, for the example of FIG. 2A, extendsymmetrically from and perpendicular to the axis formed by torsion arms206 a, 206 b. The outer ends of leverage members 212 a, 212 b connect tofour respective mounting pads 214 a, 214 b, 214 c, 214 d with 200 micronradius fillets as shown. The mounting pads are each 5 millimeterssquare.

Doped channels are formed at 220 a and 220 b and on the mounting pads214 a, 214 b, 214 c, and 214 d. Metal is deposited on mounting pads 214a, 214 b, 214 c, and 214 d, superjacent to the doped channels. Metal isalso deposited on the scan plate 204 and extending over centersuspension connectors 214 a, 214 b, to points overlapping doped channels220 a and 220 b. As will be described below, the doped channels formregions of relatively low and graded resistivity that help current toflow between non-metallized regions and the metal layers. The metal,which may be for example gold or aluminum, forms a mirror surface onscan plate 204.

The geometry of the leverage members may be varied considerably.Similarly, mounting pad geometries, including size, shape, and directionof connection with the leverage members connect, may be adjusted to suitapplication requirements. Additionally, leverage members, mounting pads,and other parts of the MEMS scanner 202 may be formed asymmetricallyaccording to application requirements. For example, as will be seen inconjunction with FIG. 2B, an entire set of two mounting pads, twoleverage members and one torsion arm may be deleted.

The geometries of the scan plate 204, suspensions (corresponding toelements 208 a, 216 a, 216 b, 218 a and 208 b, 216 c, 216 d, 218 b,respectively) and torsion arms 206 a and 206 b may similarly be variedconsiderably. For example, if a 4 millimeter by 4 millimeter scan plate204 is substituted for the 6 millimeter by 6 millimeter scan plate ofFIG. 2A, the torsion arm lengths may be shortened by 12 millimeterseach, while maintaining approximately constant resonant frequency andmaterial stress limits. Suspensions may also be varied considerablywhile maintaining the advantage of reducing scan plate dynamicdeformation.

When mounting pads 214 a, 214 b, 214 c, and 214 d (or alternativeperipheral frame) are mounted to a housing, periodic application ofpower to an actuator (not shown) will cause scan plate 204 toperiodically rotate back and forth about the axis of rotation 210defined by torsion arms 206 a, 206 b. For one embodiment, when drivenwith an appropriate signal (such as a 5 kilohertz (KHz) sine wavevarying between about 0 (zero) and 25-30 volts for a four-actuatorembodiment) the scan plate 204 responds with a ±20° mechanical scanangle at a frequency of 5 KHz.

At a mechanical scan angle of ±20°, the scanner 202 exhibits a scanangle approximately equivalent to a nine-sided rotating polygon. Otherscan angles may be chosen to match other polygon shapes. At a fullperiod scan rate of 5 KHz, scanner 202 produces bidirectional scans (oneforward and one reverse scan during each cycle) at a rate of 10 KHz.This is approximately equivalent to a nine-sided polygon mirror rotatingat 66,667 RPM. Thus, scanner 202 can achieve the scanning performance ofa relatively sophisticated rotating polygon scanner, making it suitablefor high speed applications. Alternatively, the scanner may be used toscan unidirectionally, making it approximately equivalent to a 33,333RPM nine-sided rotating polygon scanner. Unidirectional operation isachieved simply by modulating image data (or capturing image data) onlywhen the mirror is in one of the forward or reverse scan half-cycles.When used bi-directionally, suitable control electronics are used toreverse the data read-out (to the laser or from the detector) duringreverse scans.

FIG. 2B illustrates an alternative embodiment of a MEMS scanner 202. Asingle torsion arm supports a scan plate 204 through a suspension asdescribed in conjunction with FIG. 2A. The scan plate may be rotatedaround axis 210 by properly controlling the resonant frequencies ofvarious modes and/or by driving the scan plate at or very near itsresonant frequency, as will be described below.

FIG. 3 illustrates another alternative embodiment of a MEMS scanner 202.In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 3, the leverage members 212 a and212 b are formed in a serpentine shape. The distal ends of the leveragemembers would typically join to mounting pads, as illustrated above, oralternatively to a peripheral frame member. As may be appreciated, thegeometry of the leverage members may be altered substantially.

FIG. 4 shows graphs illustrating the dynamic response of the MEMSscanner of FIG. 2A when a periodic drive signal is applied. Curve 402indicates an amplitude response 404 as a function of periodic drivefrequency 406. Curve 408 illustrates scanner vs. drive phase 410 plottedagainst the same periodic drive frequency axis 406. From inspection ofcurve 402, one can see a peak in response at about 5 KHz, correspondingto the resonance frequency of the MEMS scanner in the rotation mode.While the size of the peak is plotted on a relative basis, it is, forthe exemplary embodiment, sufficiently high to produce a resonantresponse of ±20° mechanical scan angle at acceptable drive power. For afour-actuator embodiment, a drive waveform approximating a 5 KHz sinewave with amplitude of 0 (zero) to 25-30 volts results in ±20°mechanical scan angle.

The secondary peak at between 65 and 70 KHz corresponds to the resonantbehavior of the piezo-electric stack actuators.

Curve 408 illustrates how the phase relationship of the drive signal tothe MEMS scanner response inverts at the resonance points. Below 5 KHz,the phase relationship (drive to response) is 0°. Above 5 KHz but belowthe secondary peak, the phase relationship is −180°. At the primaryresonant peak, the phase relationship inverts and passes through −90°(response lagging drive) as indicated. Above the secondary peak, theresponse of the system drops and the phase response again inverts,passing from −180° below the peak, through −270° (+90°) at the secondaryresonance peak, to −360° (0°) at frequencies above the secondaryresonance peak. To maximize efficiency, it has been found to beadvantageous to operate the MEMS scanner at or very near the primaryresonance peak.

For operation at 5 KHz, the resonant frequency of the MEMS scanner istrimmed to be a few hertz above 5 KHz, typically in the range of 5.001to 5.005 KHz at room temperature. Such trimming may be accomplishedusing methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,245,590, entitled FREQUENCYTUNABLE RESONANT SCANNER AND METHOD OF MAKING, commonly assignedherewith and hereby incorporated by reference. It has been found to beadvantageous to factory trim the resonant frequency using a method ofadding weight to the scan plate in the form of a small quantity ofepoxy. Active thermal tuning of the resonant frequency is used to makethe resonant frequency substantially 5.000 KHz.

FIG. 5A illustrates a prototypical layout of MEMS scanners 202 a, 202 b,202 c, 202 d, 202 e, and 202 f on a 100 millimeter silicon wafer 502. Asmay be seen, the MEMS scanners are densely packed with interdigitatedmounting pads and mirrors. One reason for such a layout is to maximizeyield per wafer. As may be seen the scan plates of scanners 202 shown inFIG. 5 are formed in a short and wide aspect ratio.

FIG. 5B illustrates an alternative layout of MEMS scanners forfabrication from a 100 millimeter silicon wafer. The dimensions of thescanners, particularly the length of the torsion arms, has been adjustedfor more efficient interdigitated packing compared to the layout of FIG.5A. Larger wafers may also be densely packed with devices.

The term “interdigitated” means that it would not be possible to draw asquare around or dice around one semiconductor device without cuttingoff a portion of one or more neighboring semiconductor devices. That is,one or more neighboring semiconductor devices intrudes into the outlineof a geometric shape that could be formed around the semiconductordevice using a dicing saw. An etching step such as deep reactive ionetch (DRIE) or other process step is used to almost completely releasethe scanners from the wafer. The double lines formed around each deviceindicate the edges of a “moat” formed around the device. Very finesilicon “bridges” may be seen connecting the scanners to the wafer atintervals. To release the scanners, these bridges are simply broken andthe scanners popped out. The width of the bridges is set narrow enoughto usually avoid propagating a crack across the device.

In an alternative embodiment, a layer of metal is plated, or aninsulator wafer is bonded, on the back surface of the silicon waferprior to DRIE. DRIE is used to etch through the silicon wafer. The layerof metal or insulator may then hold the scanners in the wafer. The metalmay be torn to remove the scanners. Alternatively, the metal or theinsulator may be etched away to free the parts. In one embodiment,aluminum is used for the metal stabilization layer. In one embodiment,PYREX glass is used for the insulator stabilization layer. When suchstabilization layers are used, silicon bridges may be used incombination to hold the shapes in place. Alternatively, the siliconbridges may be eliminated.

FIG. 5A further illustrates an alternate leverage member 212 designwherein the ends of the “T” are offset toward the mirror.

Fabrication of a MEMS scanner 202, according to some embodiments mayinclude the formation of a doped channel or charge carrier layer asdescribed above. Phosphorus-doped silicon wafers having a bulkresistivity of 1-10 ohm-cm are used. The phosphorous-doped siliconwafers are implanted at a dose of 5×10¹⁵ phosphorus 31 atoms/cm²accelerated through 30 KeV at a maximum current of 4 mA. The dose ofphosphorus is driven for 45 minutes at 1000° C. The resulting dopedchannel is heavily doped to a depth of about 0.5 microns forming agraded channel wherein the doping concentration and resultantresistivity vary with depth. For these conditions, the wafer surface hasa doping concentration of about 1×10²⁰ phosphorus 31 atoms/cm³, yieldinga resistivity of about 0.001 ohm-cm, which falls to the wafer backgroundof about 1×10¹⁵ atoms/cm³ (or 1-10 ohm-cm) at a depth of 0.5 microns.

The doped channel creates a conduit for charge carriers to move from themetal layers into the silicon. As will be described below, current maybe applied to the MEMS scanner 202 to create joule heating. For theexemplary embodiment of the scanner of FIG. 2A, for example, mountingpads 214 a, 214 b may be driven to a positive voltage by a heateramplifier. Heater leads may couple to mounting assemblies and/or to ametallized layer on the mounting pads themselves. According to anexemplary embodiment, current flows along a metal layer that coversmounting pads 214 a, 214 b and moves into the silicon via the dopedchannels formed subjacent the metal. Current then flows within thesilicon through leverage member 212 a and torsion arm 206 a, thusforming localized heating primarily in the torsion arm 206 a. (Becausethe current flow is split along both arms of leverage member 212 a,there is reduced joule heating within the leverage member.) Wheretorsion arm 206 a meets doped channel 220 a, current flows from thesilicon and up into the metal layer formed overlapping doped channel 220a. Current flows across center suspension connector 218 a, across themetal of the mirror formed on scan plate 204, and across centersuspension connector 218 b, thus avoiding joule heating within thosestructures. Where the metal layer overlaps doped channel 220 b, currentflows down from the metal and into the silicon. Current flows throughthe torsion arm 206 b and leverage member 212 b, again causing jouleheating (primarily within the torsion arm). Current then flows throughthe doped channels formed on mounting pads 214 c, 214 d, and up into themetal layers formed thereon where it is collected by a second set ofheater leads held near ground. As is known to the art, hole movement inthe direction indicated or electron movement in the opposite directionmay form such current flow.

In some cases, an advantageous aspect of the scanner designs exemplifiedby FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3, 5A and 5B is that a minimal number of process stepsmay used in fabrication. The scanners may be formed throughout from afull thickness of silicon wafer with no partial etching to reducethickness of areas or produce raised ribs. A pattern of metallizationcorresponding to mirrors is formed on the front of wafer 502. Accordingto one embodiment, gold metallization is used for the mirrors. Backmetallization is formed on the back of wafer 502. According to oneembodiment, aluminum is used for the back metallization layer. Next, aphotoresist pattern corresponding to the semiconductor devices and thenon-etched areas therebetween is formed on the front of the wafer, andthe exposed areas are deep etched. In one embodiment, DRIE is used toetch vertical walls through the wafer. The back of the wafer iscryogenically cooled during etching and the high thermal conductivity ofthe aluminum back metallization stops the DRIE etch when it gets to theback surface of the silicon wafer. In some embodiments, the scannershapes are held in the wafer by the thin aluminum layer bridging theback of the etched outlines. In other embodiments, thin bridges ofsilicon help to hold the parts in place. The aluminum back metallizationis etched away and the photoresist is removed. The scanners are thenfree or, if silicon bridges are used, may be removed from the wafer andsingulated by breaking the bridges across the deep-etched areas. Dicingmay be avoided by using deep-etching to release the parts.

FIG. 6 illustrates an actuator arrangement for the MEMS scanner. A pairof commercially-available piezo-electric stacks 602 a and 602 b, setupon a common mounting base 604, support respective mounting pads 214 a,214 b of MEMS scanner 202 through respective first insulators 606 a, 606b. From their respective positions, the piezo-electric stacks 602 a, 602b may be alternately electrically compressed and expanded to produce aperiodic rotation of the mounting pads 214 a, 214 b about the axis ofrotation 210 defined by torsion arms 206 a, 206 b. Similarly, commonmode activation of the piezo-electric stacks 602 a, 602 b may be used torotate the MEMS scanner 202 about a transverse axis substantiallyparallel to the transverse axis of the scan plate 204.

To maintain contact between the MEMS scanner 202 and the piezo-electricactuator stacks 602 a, 602 b, respective clamps or pressure assemblies608 a and 608 b (608 b not shown) press the mounting pads 214 a, 214 bdown against the actuator stacks. Clamp 608 b is omitted from FIG. 6 forclarity. As shown, clamps 608 include (starting from the bottom of theassembly and contacting the mounting pad 314) a first pressure plate610, an optional series disk spring 612, a second pressure plate 614, asecond insulator 616, and a third pressure plate 618. In one embodiment,an edge of first pressure plate 610 is extended out from the pressureassembly as shown. As will be explained below, this provides an optionalbonding position for a heater wire or lead. Series disk spring 612 is ofa commercially available type such as SPRINGMASTERS #D63203 and isselected to have relatively low stiffness but high (>>5 KHz) intrinsicresonant frequency. A series of two springs, a different number ofsprings, or no springs at all may be used, depending upon applicationrequirements. First and second pressure plates 610 and 614 providerobust surfaces for series disk spring 612 to press against. Secondinsulator 616 provides for electrical insulation of the MEMS scanner202. First and second insulators 606, 616 are formed from a materialwith appropriate density, electrical insulating ability, and compressivestrength such as PYREX glass. First and second pressure plates 610, 614are formed from materials that are suitably electrically conductive andhave appropriate physical properties including compressive strength,toughness, and density, such as steel. Third pressure plate 618 providesa mounting surface for second insulator 616 and connects the assembly toa housing (not shown). Third pressure plate 618, preferably formed fromsteel, includes a bore 620 for receiving a mounting and adjustment screw(not shown). As may be appreciated by those skilled in the art,alternative or modified clamps may be used.

In an alternative embodiment, it has been found that the series diskspring 612 may be omitted from the pressure assemblies 608. Such amodification may offer advantages with respect to assembly ease andcost, but may hurt drive efficiency somewhat.

One or more components of the pressure assemblies 608 may optionally bekeyed to a housing or otherwise held in a substantially fixed rotationalrelationship. This reduces or eliminates torque loads transmittedthrough the assemblies during adjustment of the mounting and adjustmentscrew. By substantially reducing or eliminating torque loads through thepressure assemblies 608, substantially zero torque load is applied tothe mounting pads 214 of the MEMS scanner during assembly, thusprotecting the MEMS scanner 202 from inadvertent changes in resonantfrequency and/or scan angle range arising from slight rotation of themounting pads 214.

FIG. 7 is a view of a piezo stack actuator 602. Such actuators areavailable from several sources including PHYSIK INSTRUMENTE (ofGermany), model PICMA 885.10.

FIGS. 8 and 9 are views of a MEMS scanner housing 802 for use in a LBP,bar code scanner, LIDAR, scanned laser level, etc. Two front plates 804a, 804 b are fastened to a rear housing 806 with mounting screws 808 a,808 b, 808 c, 808 d. MEMS scanner 202 is held in a cavity therein thatallows for an appropriate amount of rotation. Threaded adjustment screwholes 810 a, 810 b, 810 c, and 810 d receive adjustment screws (notshown) that protrude into corresponding adjustment screw receiving bores620 (shown in FIG. 6). During assembly, adjustment screws are turned toprovide an appropriate amount of preload on series disk spring 612 (notshown). Behavior of the MEMS scanner under actuation can be observedthrough MEMS observation port 812, formed in the top of rear housing806. The MEMS scanner assembly 802 is secured to the exposure unit of aLBP via mounting tabs 814 a, 814 b formed in housing 806.

The use of clamps 608 to secure the MEMS scanner 202 in housing 802results in a mount that “floats”, allowing the mounting pads 214 a, 214b, 214 c, 214 d to move a bit with respect to one another. In someembodiments, slight twisting of the clamps 608 during assembly canresult in slight in-plane twisting of the mounting pads 214 a, 214 b,214 c, 214 d. This can result in undesirable residual stress in theleverage members and/or torsion bars of the MEMS scanner. Such twistingmay be reduced or eliminated by running or “burning-in” the mountedscanner for a few hours at reduced scan angle. In an exemplaryembodiment, the scanner is run at half amplitude for approximately fourhours. The burn-in process can reduce the occurrence of “infant”failures associated with mechanical failure of the leverage membersand/or torsion arms. Alternative, reduced twist clamp assembly designsmay be substituted to reduce or eliminate the need for scanner assemblyburn-in.

The MEMS scanner 202 may be driven by four piezo-electric stacks 602,one subjacent each mounting pad 214 a, 214 b, 214 c, and 214 d.Alternatively, one end of the MEMS scanner may be held in a fixedposition, i.e. mounting pads 214 c and 214 d may be clamped against asolid mounting point, and the other end of the MEMS scanner may bedriven by piezo-electric actuators, i.e. mounting pads 214 a and 214 bmay each be clamped against piezo-electric stacks as shown in FIG. 6. Ina third alternative, three of the mounting pads are clamped to a fixed,solid mounting point and one piezo-electric stack actuator is used.Typically, the choice hinges on cost vs. actuator power requirements. Asmay be appreciated, similar considerations apply to a MEMS scannerdesign 202 such as are presented in FIGS. 2B or 3.

As indicated above, the MEMS scanner is trimmed to have a resonantfrequency within a few hertz of the desired operational frequency. Asmay be appreciated from curve 402 of FIG. 4, small changes in resonantfrequency can result in relatively substantial changes in rotationamplitude (for a given periodic actuation voltage). The inventors havediscovered that controlled heating of the MEMS device further trims theresonance frequency, and hence the actuation amplitude, even though inthe exemplary embodiment the MEMS scanner has no outer frame. Referringback to FIG. 6, the extended tab on the first pressure plate 610 ofclamp 608 a receives a heater wire as does the corresponding pressureplate of clamp 608 b (not shown). Similarly, corresponding pressureplates adjacent mounting pads 214 c and 214 d (also not shown) alsoreceive heater wires. The heater wires may be attached by soldering tothe gold plated extended tab of first pressure plate 610, by solderingto metallized silicon bond pad formed, for example on the mounting pads214, or by other method as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

When both mounting pads or clamps at one end of the MEMS scanner have aheater lead attached, it is preferable to hold such neighboring leads atthe same electrical potential to avoid current flow therebetween. Incontrast, the heater lead or leads at the opposite end of the MEMSscanner may be driven to a different voltage to create current flowalong and through the torsion arms.

In use, the scan amplitude is monitored by sensors and the electricpotential between the two ends of scanner 202 (mounting pads 214 a and214 b forming one such end and mounting pads 214 c and 214 d forming theother end) is adjusted. Resistance of the silicon material itself andthe doped channel described above to current flow, and particularly thetorsion arms 206 a, 206 b, causes heating. Higher temperatures cause a“softening” of the torsion arms and a corresponding reduction inresonant frequency. Thus, when the resonant frequency is above theperiodic drive signal frequency, heating may be increased to raise thetemperature of the MEMS scanner, thereby trimming the resonant frequencyto match the drive signal frequency. Similarly, when the resonantfrequency of the MEMS scanner falls to be below the drive signalfrequency, heating may be reduced, thus cooling the device and raisingits resonant frequency to match the drive signal frequency. Inalternative embodiments, thermal trimming may be used to change the scanamplitude even when, for a given system design, the scanner is notoperated precisely at its resonant frequency.

It has been experimentally determined that 0 to 1.5 W of tuning powercan provide a resonant frequency tuning range of about 8 Hz. This rangemay be somewhat lower at higher scanning frequencies and somewhat higherat lower scanning frequencies, presumably as a result of airflow overthe scanner providing cooling during operation.

Turning now to FIG. 10, a block diagram showing a control system 1002for driving a MEMS scanner is shown. For many applications, it isadvantageous to precisely control the phase and amplitude of scanning ofa MEMS scanner. Scanned beam applications including bar code scanners,laser cameras, scanned beam displays, electrophotographic printers andothers, can benefit from precise control of MEMS scanner phase and/oramplitude.

Similarly, precise control of scanner resonant frequency can minimizepower consumption, and perhaps even make feasible certain applications,by allowing operation of the scanner at its resonant frequency, ratherthan somewhat off resonance as has heretofore been typical practice.

The block diagram of a control system 1002 of FIG. 10 includes threeoverlapping servo loops for driving and controlling a MEMS scanner; anamplitude control servo loop 1004, a phase control servo loop 1006, anda resonance frequency control servo loop 1008, outlined by respectivemedium, short, and long dashed lines as indicated.

Turning first to the amplitude control loop 1004, low voltage drivesignal 1009 is amplified by a high voltage amplifier 1010 produces aperiodic high voltage drive signal 1011 that drives one or moreactuators, in the form of piezo-electric driver stacks 602, to induceperiodic oscillations in a resonant MEMS scan mirror 202. As will beappreciated, alternative actuator technologies, such as magnetic,electrostatic, thermal, and other types of actuators could besubstituted for piezo-electric actuators 602.

A variety of technologies can be used to monitor the phase, amplitude,position, and/or speed of MEMS scan mirror 202. In the exemplaryembodiment, the light beam deflected by the mirror includesapproximately 20% overscan, the edge of the imaging region thus endingat 80% scan. An optical detector 1012, comprising a pair of adjacentsensor areas is positioned with its center point (the center of theregion between the sensor areas) at 85% of the scan range. The outputfrom one sensor area is subtracted from the output of the other sensorarea by converter 1014. Converter 1014 is a difference andpulse-width-to-voltage converter that outputs a negative voltageproportional to the amount of time the beam is beyond the central 85% ofscan range as scan amplitude signal 1016.

A microprocessor 1018 sets an amplitude set point voltage signal 1020that is added to scan amplitude signal 1016 in adder 1022, to produceraw amplitude error signal 1024. Thus, if the scan amplitude is greaterthan desired, the absolute magnitude of the negative scan amplitudesignal 1016 will be greater than the absolute magnitude of the set pointsignal 1020, and the raw amplitude error signal 1024 will be a negativenumber. Conversely, if the scan amplitude is less than desired, theabsolute magnitude of the negative scan amplitude signal 1016 will beless than the absolute magnitude of the set point signal 1020, and theraw amplitude error signal 1024 will be a positive number.

Raw amplitude error signal 1024 is fed to proportional integralcontroller (PIC) 1026. PIC 1026 produces conditioned amplitude errorsignal 1028. PIC 1026 acts to dampen the system response to fluctuationsin scan amplitude. It averages variations in raw amplitude error signal1024 voltages and acts to control the rate at which changes in amplitudeerror are fed back to affect the high voltage drive signal, therebyimproving stability and performance of the amplitude control servo loop1004.

Raw drive signal 1030 a periodic, low voltage signal that is the nominalphase-corrected signal for driving the MEMS scanner. Raw drive signal1030 is received and is multiplied by gain circuit 1032 to produce lowvoltage drive signal 1009. Thus, if the amplitude of the MEMS scanner202 is measured to be too low, conditioned amplitude error signal 1028is a relatively high voltage that, when multiplied by raw drive signal1030 in gain circuit 1032 produces a relatively large amplitude lowvoltage drive signal 1009. If the amplitude of the MEMS scanner ismeasured to be too high, conditioned amplitude error signal 1028 is arelatively low voltage that, when multiplied by raw drive signal 1030 ingain circuit 1032 produces a relatively low amplitude low voltage drivesignal 1009. Either case thereby serves to bring the scan amplitude backto a desired value set by the microprocessor 1018 as set point voltagesignal 1020.

Phase control servo loop 1006 operates as a phase locked loop. Converter1014, described above in conjunction with amplitude control servo loop1004, produces phase mark signal 1034 that is also passed back to thehost controller as horizontal synchronization signal 1035. Phase marksignal 1034 is generated from the subtracted detector pair signals usingone edge, i.e. one scan direction. Like edges of reference signal 1036and phase mark signal 1034 are compared by first phase frequencydetector 1038. First phase frequency detector 1038 produces periodicspikes on raw phase error signal 1040, the width of the spikes beingproportional to phase error, and the sign of the spikes indicatingwhether the phase mark signal 1034 is early or late with respect toreference signal 1036.

First low pass filter 1042 converts the periodic spikes on raw phaseerror signal 1040 to a dc voltage as first conditioned phase errorsignal 1044. First low pass filter 1042 sets first conditioned phaseerror signal 1044 to a relatively low value if the phase mark 1034 isearly relative to reference signal 1036. Conversely, first low passfilter 1042 sets first conditioned phase error signal 1044 to arelatively high value if the phase mark 1034 is late relative toreference signal 1036.

First conditioned phase error signal 1044 is passed to a voltagecontrolled drive waveform generator 1046. The voltage of firstconditioned phase error signal 1044 determines the frequency of the rawdrive signal 1030 output by the voltage controlled drive waveformgenerator 1046.

Thus, if a phase mark signal 1034 is early relative to reference signal1036, the first phase frequency detector 1038 outputs a negative spikeon raw phase error signal 1040, the width of the spike beingproportional to the magnitude of the error between the phase mark signal1034 and the reference signal 1036; a series of negative spikes on rawphase error signal 1040 drives first low pass filter 1042 to output arelatively low voltage on first conditioned phase error signal 1044, thevoltage being moderately low if the spike widths on raw phase errorsignal 1040 are narrow and the voltage being more extreme (lower) if thespike widths are wider; a low voltage on first conditioned phase errorsignal 1044 causes voltage controlled drive waveform generator 1046 tooutput a lower frequency raw drive signal 1030, small deviations inphase (moderately low voltage on first conditioned phase error signal1044) causing moderate decreases in frequency and relatively largerdeviations in phase (lower voltage on first conditioned phase errorsignal 1044) causing larger decreases in frequency; the lower frequencyserves to retard the phase of the MEMS mirror, causing phase mark signal1034 to be output somewhat later, thereby bringing phase mark signal1034 back into synchronicity with reference signal 1036, and causing aphase lock to reference signal 1036.

If phase mark signal 1034 is late relative to reference signal 1036, thevoltage of first conditioned phase error signal 1044 is increased,causing the drive frequency of raw drive signal 1030 to increase, andsimilarly bringing the phase mark signal 1034 back into synchronicitywith reference signal 1036. The time constant of low pass filter 1042serves to provide damping to the phase servo control system 1006.

Referring now to resonant frequency servo control loop 1008, therelative phases of the drive signal and the scanner response are used toadjust MEMS scanner resonant frequency. As was described above inconjunction with FIG. 4, the MEMS scanner response phase varies withrespect to drive phase with frequency as illustrated by curve 408. Atthe primary spike in scanner amplitude response curve 402, the phaserelationship between the drive signal and the scanner response rapidlyinverts from in-phase (0°) below the primary resonant peak to −180° outof phase above the primary resonant peak, passing through −90° at theprimary resonant peak. Resonant frequency servo control loop 1008 makesuse of this change in phase response to keep the resonant response ofthe MEMS scanner tuned to match the drive frequency.

At its primary peak in resonant response, the MEMS device phase responseto a drive signal rapidly shifts from 0° to −180°, passing through −90°at its resonance peak. While this inversion is shown as substantiallyinstantaneous in FIG. 4 (owing to the broad frequency range of thechart), the inversion actually takes place over a few Hertz. Thus, it isdesirable to maintain the phase offset between the phase mark signal1034 and the drive signal 1030 at −90°, indicating operation of the MEMSscanner at its resonance peak.

According to an exemplary embodiment, the temperature dependence of theMEMS scanner resonant frequency is used to advantage. The phase marksignal 1034 is compared to raw drive signal 1030 by second phasefrequency detector 1048, which cooperates with second low pass filter1050 to produce a second conditioned phase error signal 1052. Secondphase frequency detector 1048 is set to output a nominal voltage onsecond conditioned phase error signal when the phase offset between thephase mark signal 1034 and the drive signal 1030 is −90°, increasing thevoltage when the relative phase is between −90° and −180°, anddecreasing the voltage when the relative phase is between 0° and −90°.The nominal voltage is that voltage appropriate for setting currentthrough the MEMS scanner 202 to make the resonant frequency match thedrive frequency. According to an exemplary embodiment and as describedabove, the MEMS scanner is trimmed during manufacturing to have aprimary resonance peak a few hertz above the nominal operating frequencyat room temperature. Current is then supplied by the resonance frequencyservo control loop 1008 to reduce the resonance frequency of the MEMSscanner 202 to match the drive frequency 1030 as shown.

Switch 1054 is normally closed when the system is in operation (afterstart-up). Thus the voltage on second conditioned phase error signal1052 is passed to heater amplifier 1056. When the relative phase betweenthe phase mark signal 1034 and drive signal 1030 is between −90° and−180°, second phase frequency detector 1048 and second low pass filter1050 cooperate to raise the voltage on second conditioned phase errorsignal 1052 proportionally to the degree of deviation from −90°. Heateramplifier 1056 is thus driven to set a voltage across MEMS mirror 202when the phase of the mirror response lags behind the phase of thedrive. Such a condition corresponds to the resonant peak of the mirrorbeing higher than the drive frequency.

As was described above, increasing the electrical potential across thesemiconductive MEMS scanner 202 leads to increased joule heating withinthe scanner, thus raising its temperature. Raising the temperature ofthe MEMS scanner 202 lowers its peak resonance frequency. Thus, when thepeak resonance frequency of the MEMS scanner 202 is above the drivesignal frequency, its phase tends to lag the phase of the drive signalby somewhat less than 90°, and the resonant frequency servo control loop1008 causes an increase in temperature of the scanner, bringing thephase difference into the appropriate relationship, and thereby reducingthe peak resonance frequency of the MEMS scanner 202 to match the drivesignal frequency. Conversely, if the MEMS scanner 202 is heatedsufficiently to lower its peak resonance frequency below the drivefrequency, its phase tends to lag the drive signal by somewhat more than90°, and the control loop reduces heater current flow, thus raising thepeak resonance frequency a little to make it match the drive frequencyuntil the phase relationship is again −90°. This control loop allows thescanner to be operated substantially at its peak resonant frequency andthus minimizes actuator power requirements.

Returning to FIG. 10, microprocessor 1018 includes communicationprovision 1058 and includes an ambient temperature sensor 1060. It canalso be seen that second conditioned phase error signal 1052 and phasemark signal 1034 are sent to microprocessor 1018 and that control lines1062 and 1064 connect respectively with switch 1054 and heater amplifier1056. Many or all of these features are used during system start-up.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a start-up method used by the system1002 shown in FIG. 10. When power is on during an idle statecorresponding to process 1102, the phase control loop 1006 and resonantfrequency control loop 1008 are both run using simulated feedback. Themicroprocessor 1018 first sets a voltage on line 1044 that is sent tothe voltage controlled waveform generator 1046. The raw drive signalline 1032 then serves as input to a converter (not shown) that outputs asimulated phase mark signal 1034 to the first phase frequency detector1038. The first phase frequency detector 1038 then compares thesimulated phase mark signal 1034 to the reference signal 1036,outputting a raw phase error signal 1040 to first low pass filter 1042that, in turn, sets a voltage on conditioned phase error signal 1044.Thus the phase servo control loop 1006 continues to run independent ofMEMS scanner movement and detection.

To run the resonant frequency servo control loop 1008, themicroprocessor 1018 reads an ambient temperature from ambienttemperature sensor 1060. The temperature sensor value is converted to adigital value that serves as an index to a resonant frequency look-uptable (LUT) (not shown). The resultant resonant frequency LUT valuedrives a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) that outputs a synthesizedresonant frequency voltage signal 1064 to drive heater amplifier 1056.As during operation, heater amplifier 1056 then sets a voltage acrossthe MEMS scanner 202 and joule heating raises the temperature of theMEMS scanner to a temperature corresponding to the resonant frequencyLUT value. In some embodiments, the resonant frequency LUT is derivedfor each MEMS scanner 202 as a factory calibration step by determiningthe scanner temperature necessary to trim its resonant frequency to atarget operating frequency, for example 5 KHz. In other embodiments, theLUT can be set for a batch of MEMS scanners or for all MEMS scanners.Thus, during the idle state corresponding to process 1102, the resonantfrequency servo control loop 1008 is operative to keep MEMS scanner 202at a nominal operating temperature set to match its resonant frequencyto the reference signal 1036 frequency.

As an alternative to sensing ambient temperature, temperature sensor1060 may be thermally coupled to MEMS scanner 202 and measure itstemperature.

While in the power-on idle process 1102, the microprocessor 1018 checksto determine if a start signal is received from the host controller overinterface 1058, as indicated by conditional step 1104. As indicated bythe “NO” decision, power-on idle process 1102 continues until a startsignal is received from the host controller. When a start signal isreceived, the embedded software proceeds to start-up amplitude controlprocess 1106. Upon entering start-up amplitude control process 1106,microprocessor 1018 sets low voltage drive signal 1009 to drive highvoltage amplifier 1010 to produce high voltage drive signal 1011 at amaximum amplitude, thus overdriving the piezo-electric stack actuators602. Overdriving piezo-electric stack actuators 602 results in veryrapid ramp-up of scan amplitude. According to one start-up embodiment,high voltage drive signal 1011 comprises a sine wave at the reference 5KHz frequency with an amplitude of 0 (zero) to 60 volts. In thisembodiment the MEMS scanner is driven to reach approximately 90% of itsnominal scan angle in only 20 milliseconds, resulting in faster systemstart-up than would result from applying the lower nominal steady-statedrive voltage of about 0 to 20 volts.

In other embodiments, the high voltage drive signal may be set with evengreater amplitude, up to near the dielectric breakdown voltage of theactuators 602. High start-up drive voltages are possible because theyare only applied for a relatively short time; too short to exceed thethermal limitations of the actuators.

While in start-up amplitude control process 1106, the system looks for astable phase mark signal 1034, as indicated by decision process 1108. Astable phase mark signal is determined by monitoring a circuit (notshown) that averages several successive phase marks to determine thatthey meet amplitude control servo loop 1004 requirements. Once a stablephase mark signal is present, meaning that the MEMS scanner 202 isoperating at a relatively constant frequency and with sufficientamplitude that the scanned beam crosses the optical amplitude sensors1012, the process moves to closed loop amplitude control process 1110,where scanner amplitude is controlled by the amplitude control servoloop 1004. Upon entering closed loop amplitude control process 1110, thePIC 1026 introduces changes to the drive amplitude at a rate consistentwith stable operation, as discussed above.

Closed loop amplitude control process 1110 continues while the systemwaits to ensure system stabilization, indicated by the “wait” process1112. According to one embodiment, the system waits 100 millisecondsbefore proceeding to closed loop phase control process 1114, whereinphase mark signal 1034 (produced by converter 1014) is coupled to firstphase frequency detector 1038 and the synthesized phase mark signalgenerated from raw drive signal 1030 is decoupled). Process 1114 locksthe MEMS scanner 202 frequency to the reference signal 1036 frequency,thus engaging phase control servo loop 1006 as a phase locked loop, asdescribed above.

While closed loop phase control process 1114 proceeds, the system pausesfor a time, for example 30 milliseconds, as indicated by process 1116.After wait process 1116 is completed, the system enters closed loopresonant frequency control process 1118, wherein resonant frequencyservo loop 1008 is engaged. Resonant frequency servo loop 1008 isengaged by closing switch 1062 and substantially simultaneously ceasingthe output of DAC signal 1064 from the microprocessor 1018. This causessecond conditioned phase error signal 1052 to drive heater amplifier1056 according to the method described above in conjunction with FIG.10.

According to an exemplary embodiment, the start-up process of FIG. 11generally results in stable operation of the scanning system within lessthan two seconds after receiving a start-up command from the hostcontroller.

The preceding overview of the invention, brief description of thedrawings, and detailed description describe exemplary embodimentsaccording to the present invention in a manner intended to foster easeof understanding by the reader. Other structures, methods, andequivalents may be within the scope of the invention. As such, the scopeof the invention described herein shall be limited only by the claims.

1. A MEMS scanner; comprising: a scan plate having longitudinal andlateral dimensions; a first torsion arm coupled to the scan plate andextending longitudinally from a proximal to a distal location therefrom,the first torsion arm defining an axis of rotation of the scan plate; afirst leverage member coupled to the distal location of the firsttorsion arm and extending laterally therefrom in opposing directionsfrom an axial location coincident with the first torsion arm to twolateral locations, the lateral locations forming junctions with one ormore mounting structures; wherein the first torsion arm and the firstleverage member each have about the same cross-sectional area and thefirst leverage member is configured to reduce stress in the torsion arm;and wherein the scan plate is coupled to the first torsion arm via ascan plate mounting structure, the scan plate mounting structurecomprising: a suspension beam coupled to the first torsion arm at alocation of the suspension beam generally coincident with the axis ofrotation, and further coupled to the scan plate at one or more pointsnot coincident with the axis of rotation; and an axial connectorcoupling the suspension beam with the scan plate at a location generallycoincident with the axis of rotation.
 2. The MEMS scanner of claim 1;wherein the first leverage member is substantially straight.
 3. The MEMSscanner of claim 1; wherein the first leverage member is of a serpentineshape.
 4. The MEMS scanner of claim 1; wherein the first leverage memberis axially symmetric with respect to the first torsion arm.
 5. The MEMSscanner of claim 1; wherein the one or more mounting structures includestwo mounting pads, each pad being coupled to a respective laterallocation of the first leverage member.
 6. The MEMS scanner of claim 1;wherein the first torsion arm is the only torsion arm.
 7. The MEMSscanner of claim 1; wherein at least one of the support structuresincludes a piezo-electric stack actuator.
 8. The MEMS scanner of claim1; further comprising a mirror formed on a surface of the scan plate. 9.The MEMS scanner of claim 1; further comprising: a suspension; andwherein the scan plate is coupled to the respective first torsion armthrough the suspension, the suspension being operative to spread adynamic torque load across the scan plate.
 10. The MEMS scanner of claim1; further comprising: a second torsion arm, coaxial to the firsttorsion arm, coupled to the scan plate and extending longitudinally froma proximal to a distal location therefrom, the second torsion armcooperating with the first torsion arm to form the axis of rotation ofthe scan plate; a second leverage member coupled to the distal locationof the second torsion arm and extending laterally therefrom in opposingdirections from an axial location coincident with the second torsion armto two lateral locations, the lateral locations forming junctions withone or more mounting structures.
 11. The MEMS scanner of claim 10;wherein the one or more mounting structures include first, second,third, and fourth mounting pads, each mounting pad coupled to a laterallocation of a respective leverage member.
 12. The MEMS scanner of claim11; further comprising first, second, third, and fourth clamps, eachclamp coupled to compressively hold a respective mounting pad against arespective support structure.
 13. The MEMS scanner of claim 12; whereinat least one of the support structures includes a piezo-electric stackactuator.
 14. The MEMS scanner of claim 10; further comprising a mirrorformed on a surface of the scan plate.
 15. The MEMS scanner of claim 10;wherein the scan plate, the two torsion arms, and the two leveragemembers are formed from silicon.
 16. The MEMS scanner of claim 10;further comprising: first and second opposed suspensions; and whereinthe scan plate is coupled to the respective first and second torsionarms through the first and second opposed suspensions, the first andsecond opposed suspensions being operative to spread a dynamic torqueload across the scan plate.
 17. The MEMS scanner of claim 10; wherein:the one or more mounting structures include at least two mounting pads,each of the at least two mounting pads being coupled to a respectiveleverage member.
 18. The MEMS scanner of claim 17; further comprising:at least two conductive leads, each conductive lead being electricallycoupled to a respective one of the two or more mounting pads.
 19. TheMEMS scanner of claim 18; wherein the at least two conductive leads areoperable to apply an electrical potential across the first and secondleverage members, the first and second torsion arms, and the scan plate.20. The MEMS scanner of claim 18; wherein the at least two conductiveleads are operable to apply an electrical potential across the MEMSscanner, the electrical potential being operative to modify a resonantfrequency of the MEMS scanner.
 21. The MEMS scanner of claim 10; whereinthe length of each torsion arm is greater than about two times thelongitudinal dimension of the scan plate.
 22. The MEMS scanner of claim21; wherein the length of each torsion arm is greater than about fourtimes the longitudinal dimension of the scan plate.
 23. A MEMS scanner;comprising: a scan plate having longitudinal and lateral dimensions; afirst torsion arm coupled to the scan plate and extending longitudinallyfrom a proximal to a distal location therefrom, the first torsion armdefining an axis of rotation of the scan plate; a first leverage membercoupled to the distal location of the first torsion arm and extendinglaterally therefrom in opposing directions from an axial locationcoincident with the first torsion arm to two lateral locations, thelateral locations forming junctions with one or more mountingstructures; a second torsion arm, coaxial to the first torsion arm,coupled to the scan plate and extending longitudinally from a proximalto a distal location therefrom, the second torsion arm cooperating withthe first torsion arm to form the axis of rotation of the scan plate; asecond leverage member coupled to the distal location of the secondtorsion arm and extending laterally therefrom in opposing directionsfrom an axial location coincident with the second torsion arm to twolateral locations, the lateral locations forming functions with one ormore mounting structures; mounting structures include first, second;third, and fourth mounting pads, each mounting pad coupled to a laterallocation of a respective leverage member; first, second, third, andfourth clamps, each clamp coupled to compressively hold a respectivemounting pad against a respective support structure; and four supportstructures; wherein two of the support structures include respectivepiezoelectric stack actuators and two of the support structures includea substantially immoveable housing.
 24. A MEMS scanner; comprising: ascan plate having a lateral dimension and a longitudinal dimension;first and second opposed torsion arms, each torsion arm coupled to thescan plate and extending longitudinally from a proximal to a distallocation therefrom, the first and second torsion arms defining an axisof rotation of the scan plate; and first and second opposed mountingstructures, each mounting structure coupled to a distal location of arespective torsion arm and including first and second opposed leveragemembers having respective cross sectional areas substantially similar tocross sectional areas of the first and second torsion arms andconfigured to reduce stress in the torsion arms, each leverage membercoupled to a distal location of a respective torsion arm and extendinglaterally therefrom in opposing directions from an axial locationcoincident with a respective torsion arm to two equidistant laterallocations, the equidistant lateral locations forming a junction with oneor more mounting structures; and wherein, each of the first and secondtorsion arms has a length greater than about four times the longitudinaldimension of the scan plate; wherein the scan plate is coupled to thefirst and second opposed torsion arms via a scan plate mountingstructure for each of the first and second opposed torsion arms, thescan plate mounting structure comprising: a suspension beam coupled to arespective one of the first and second torsion arms at a location of thesuspension beam generally coincident with the axis of rotation, andfurther coupled to the scan plate at one or more points not coincidentwith the axis of rotation; and an axial connector coupling thesuspension beam with the scan plate at a location generally coincidentwith the axis of rotation.
 25. The MEMS scanner of claim 24; wherein thefirst and second mounting structures include first, second, third, andfourth mounting pads, each mounting pad coupled to an equidistantlateral location of a respective leverage member.
 26. The MEMS scannerof claim 25; further comprising first, second, third, and fourth clamps,each clamp coupled to compressively hold a respective mounting padagainst a respective support structure.
 27. The MEMS scanner of claim26; wherein at least one of the support structures includes apiezo-electric stack actuator.
 28. The MEMS scanner of claim 24; furthercomprising a mirror formed on a surface of the scan plate.
 29. The MEMSscanner of claim 24; wherein the scan plate, the two torsion arms, andthe two leverage members are formed from silicon.
 30. The MEMS scannerof claim 24; further comprising: first and second opposed suspensions;and wherein the scan plate is coupled to the respective first and secondtorsion arms through the first and second opposed suspensions, the firstand second opposed suspensions being operative to spread a dynamictorque load across the scan plate.
 31. The MEMS scanner of claim 24;further comprising: at least two conductive leads, each conductive leadbeing electrically coupled to a respective one of the two or moremounting pads.
 32. The MEMS scanner of claim 31; wherein the at leasttwo conductive leads are operable to apply an electrical potentialacross the first and second leverage members, the first and secondtorsion arms, and the scan plate.
 33. The MEMS scanner of claim 31;wherein the at least two conductive leads are operable to apply anelectrical potential across the MEMS scanner, the electrical potentialbeing operative to modify a resonant frequency of the MEMS scanner. 34.The MEMS scanner of claim 24; wherein the lateral dimension of the scanplate is greater than about four times the longitudinal dimension of thescan plate.
 35. The MEMS scanner of claim 34; wherein the lateraldimension of the scan plate is greater than about eight times thelongitudinal dimension of the scan plate.
 36. A MEMS scanner;comprising: a scan plate having a lateral dimension and a longitudinaldimension; first and second opposed torsion arms, each torsion armcoupled to the scan plate and extending longitudinally from a proximalto a distal location therefrom, the first and second torsion armsdefining an axis of rotation of the scan plate; and first and secondopposed mounting structures, each mounting structure coupled to a distallocation of a respective torsion arm and including first and secondopposed leverage members, each leverage member coupled to a distallocation of a respective torsion arm and extending laterally therefromin opposing directions from an axial location coincident with arespective torsion arm to two equidistant lateral locations, theequidistant lateral locations forming a junction with one or moremounting pads, further including first, second, third, and fourthmounting pads, each mounting pad coupled to an equidistant laterallocation of a respective leverage member; and first, second, third, andfourth clamps, each clamp coupled to compressively hold a respectivemounting pad against a respective support structure; wherein two of thesupport structures include respective piezo-electric stack actuators andtwo of the support structures include a substantially immoveablehousing; and wherein, each of the first and second torsion arms has alength greater than about four times the longitudinal dimension of thescan plate.
 37. A MEMS scanner; comprising: a scan plate having alateral dimension and a longitudinal dimension; first and second opposedtorsion arms, each torsion arm coupled to the scan plate and extendinglongitudinally from a proximal to a distal location therefrom, the firstand second torsion arms defining an axis of rotation of the scan plate;and first and second opposed mounting structures, each comprising aleverage member having a width similar to widths of the torsion arms andconfigured to reduce stress in the torsion arms, coupled to a distallocation of the respective torsion arm and extending laterally therefromin opposing directions from an axial location coincident with therespective torsion arm to two equidistant lateral points; and first andsecond heater leads coupled to respective first and second opposedmounting structures, the heater leads being operable to pass currentthrough the MEMS scanner to produce joule heating in the MEMS scanner;wherein the scan plate is coupled to the first and second opposedtorsions arm via a scan plate mounting structure for each of the firstand second opposed torsion arms, the scan plate mounting structurecomprising: a suspension beam coupled to a respective one or the firstand second opposed torsion arms at a location of the suspension beamgenerally coincident with the axis of rotation, and further coupled tothe scan plate at one or more points not coincident with the axis ofrotation; and an axial connector coupling the suspension beam with thescan plate at a location generally coincident with the axis of rotation.38. The MEMS scanner of claim 37; wherein the first and second mountingstructures each includes first and second mounting pads, each mountingpad coupled to the equidistant lateral point of a respective leveragemember.
 39. The MEMS scanner of claim 38; further comprising first,second, third, and fourth clamps, each clamp coupled to compressivelyhold a respective mounting pad against a respective support structure.40. The MEMS scanner of claim 38; wherein the first and second heaterleads are each electrically coupled to one of the first and secondmounting pads coupled to each of the two leverage members.
 41. The MEMSscanner of claim 40; wherein the first and second heater leads areoperable to apply an electrical potential across the first and secondleverage members, the first and second torsion arms, and the scan plate.42. The MEMS scanner of claim 40; wherein the first and second heaterleads are operable to apply an electrical potential across the MEMSscanner, the electrical potential being operative to modify a resonantfrequency of the MEMS scanner.
 43. The MEMS scanner of claim 39; whereinat least one of the support structures includes a piezo-electric stackactuator.
 44. The MEMS scanner of claim 37; wherein the scan plate, thetwo torsion arms, and the two leverage members are formed from silicon.45. The MEMS scanner of claim 37; further comprising a mirror formed ona surface of the scan plate.
 46. The MEMS scanner of claim 37; furthercomprising: first and second opposed suspensions; and wherein the scanplate is coupled to the respective first and second torsion arms throughthe first and second opposed suspensions, the first and second opposedsuspensions being operative to spread a dynamic torque load across thescan plate.
 47. The MEMS scanner of claim 37; wherein the lateraldimension of the scan plate is greater than about four times thelongitudinal dimension of the scan plate.
 48. The MEMS scanner of claim47; wherein the lateral dimension of the scan plate is greater thanabout eight times the longitudinal dimension of the scan plate.
 49. TheMEMS scanner of claim 37; wherein the length of each torsion arm isgreater than about four times the longitudinal dimension of the scanplate.
 50. The MEMS scanner of claim 49; wherein the length of eachtorsion arm is greater than about 8 times the longitudinal dimension ofthe scan plate.
 51. A MEMS scanner; comprising: a scan plate having alateral dimension and a longitudinal dimension; first and second opposedtorsion arms, each torsion arm coupled to the scan plate and extendinglongitudinally from a proximal to a distal location therefrom, the firstand second torsion arms defining an axis of rotation of the scan plate;and first and second opposed mounting structures each mounting structurecoupled to a distal location of a respective torsion arm; and first andsecond heater leads coupled to respective first and second opposedmounting structures, the heater leads being operable to pass currentthrough the MEMS scanner to produce joule heating in the MEMS scanner;wherein the first and second mounting structures each include: aleverage member, coupled to the distal location of the respectivetorsion arm and extending laterally therefrom in opposing directionsfrom an axial location coincident with the respective torsion arm to twoequidistant lateral points; and first and second mounting pads, eachmounting pad coupled to the equidistant lateral point of a respectiveleverage member; and wherein the MEMS scanner further comprises: first,second, third, and fourth clamps, each clamp coupled to compressivelyhold a respective mounting pad, against a respective: support structure;wherein two of the support structures include respective piezo-electricstack actuators and two of the support structures include asubstantially immoveable housing.
 52. A MEMS scanner; comprising: a scanplate having a lateral dimension and a longitudinal dimension; first andsecond opposed torsion arms, each torsion arm coupled to the scan plateand extending longitudinally from a proximal to a distal locationtherefrom, the first and second torsion arms defining an axis ofrotation of the scan plate; and first and second opposed mountingstructures, each mounting structure comprising a leverage member coupledto a distal location of a respective torsion arm and extending laterallytherefrom in opposing directions from an axial location coincident withthe respective torsion arm to two equidistant lateral points, theleverage member having a cross-sectional area about the same as thetorsion arm being configured to undergo bending deformation when thecorresponding torsion arm undergoes torsional deformation; and at leasttwo clamps, each clamp coupled to compressively hold a respectivemounting structure against a respective support structure; wherein thescan plate is coupled to the first and second opposed torsion arms via ascan plate mounting structure for each of the first and second opposedtorsion arms, the scan plate mounting structure comprising: a suspensionbeam coupled to a respective one of the first and second opposed torsionarms at a location of the suspension beam generally coincident with theaxis of rotation, and further coupled to the scan plate at one or morepoints not coincident with the axis of rotation; and an axial connectorcoupling the suspension beam with the scan plate at a location generallycoincident with the axis of rotation.
 53. The MEMS scanner of claim 52;wherein the first and second mounting structures each includes first andsecond mounting pads, each mounting pad coupled to the equidistantlateral point of a respective leverage member.
 54. The MEMS scanner ofclaim 53; wherein the at least two clamps includes first, second, third,and fourth clamps, each clamp coupled to compressively hold therespective mounting pad against the respective support structure. 55.The MEMS scanner of claim 54; wherein at least one of the supportstructures includes a piezo-electric stack actuator.
 56. The MEMSscanner of claim 52; further comprising: first and second opposedsuspensions; and wherein the scan plate is coupled to the respectivefirst and second torsion arms through the first and second opposedsuspensions, the first and second opposed suspensions being operative tospread a dynamic torque load across the scan plate.
 57. The MEMS scannerof claim 52; wherein the scan plate, torsion arms, and mountingstructures are composed of a semiconductor.
 58. The MEMS scanner ofclaim 57; wherein the semiconductor is silicon.
 59. A MEMS scanner;comprising: a scan plate having a lateral dimension and a longitudinaldimension; first and second opposed torsion arms, each torsion armcoupled to the scan plate and extending longitudinally from a proximalto a distal location therefrom, the first and second torsion armsdefining an axis of rotation of the scan plate; first and second opposedmounting structures; and first, second, third, and fourth supportstructures; wherein each mounting structure comprises: a leverage membercoupled to a distal location of a respective torsion arm and extendinglaterally therefrom in opposing directions from an axial locationcoincident with the respective torsion arm to two equidistant lateralpoints; first and second mounting pads, each mounting pad coupled to theequidistant lateral point of a respective leverage member; and first,second, third, and fourth clamps, each clamp coupled to compressivelyhold the respective mounting pad against the respective supportstructure; and wherein two of the support structures include respectivepiezo-electric stack actuators and two of the support structures includea substantially immoveable housing.
 60. A MEMS scanner; comprising: afirst mounting structure including a first leverage member; a firsttorsion arm coupled to the first leverage member; a scan mirror coupledto the first torsion arm, the scan mirror being operable to rotate toand fro around a scan axis defined by the first torsion arm; a secondtorsion arm substantially coaxial with the first torsion arm coupled tothe scan mirror; and a second mounting structure, separate from thefirst mounting structure, including a second leverage member coupled tothe second torsion arm; wherein the first and second torsion arms andfirst and second leverage members are configured to undergo elasticdeformation when the scan mirror rotates wherein the scan mirror iscoupled to the first torsion arm and the second torsion arm via a scanmirror mounting structure for each of the first torsion arm and thesecond torsion arm, the scan mirror mounting structure comprising: asuspension beam coupled to a respective one of the first torsion arm andthe second torsion arm at a location of the suspension beam generallycoincident with the axis of rotation, and further coupled to the scanmirror at one or more points not coincident with the axis of rotation;and an axial connector coupling the suspension beam with the scan mirrorat a location generally coincident with the axis of rotation.
 61. TheMEMS scanner of claim 60; wherein the first mounting structure, firsttorsion arm, scan mirror, second torsion arm, and second mountingstructure are formed from a single piece of silicon.
 62. The MEMSscanner of claim 61; further comprising a layer of metal on a surface ofthe scan mirror.
 63. The MEMS scanner of claim 60; wherein the firstmounting structure further includes: a first mounting pad; operablyconnected to a first end to the first leverage member; and a secondmounting pad operably connected to a second end of the first leveragemember.